Advertisement
Written by the OrganizedWisdom Team with Emily Lapkin as the reviewer. All original content is supervised by the The OrganizedWisdom Medical Review Team
Dr. Lenore Margaret Buckley, M.D., specializes in rheumatology.1 A rheumatologist diagnoses and treats diseases of the joints, muscles, and connective tissues. Examples of common conditions treated by rheumatologists include gout, rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, polymyalgia rheumatica, and ankylosing spondylitis. Dr. Buckley is based in Richmond, Virginia.1
Fast Facts
Dr. Buckley, do you have updates for us? Replace this page with a full Digital Office (like Dr. Krein's) by signing up now. Both free and paid accounts are available, or you can just contact us with your updates.
Thanks for helping us improve this WisdomCard. We'll let you know if your resource makes the Top 10!.
Have another great resource to share? Go ahead and nominate another resource!
We have 2 top resources but need 8 more. Does Dr. Buckley have blogs, official sites, articles, or any other great resources we should include here?
Advertisement
,000-7,000 per fracture avoided. CONCLUSION: Calcium and vitamin D supplements and low cost bisphosphonate regimens such as cyclic etidronate decrease the life-time vertebral fracture risk at acceptable costs and should be considered when initiating glucocorticoid treatment for women who do not have osteoporosis."
"pubmed_article7": "Attitudes of clinical faculty about career progress, career success and recognition, and commitment to academic medicine. Results of a survey." "pubmed_abstract7": "OBJECTIVE: To assess attitudes about career progress, resources for career development, and commitment to academic medicine in physician faculty at an academic medical center who spend more than 50% of their time in clinical care. DESIGN: Faculty survey. SETTING: Academic medical center and associated Veterans Affairs medical center. RESULTS: A total of 310 physician faculty responded to the survey. Half of the faculty reported spending 50% or less of their time in clinical care (mean, 31% of time) (group 1) and half reported spending more than 50% of their time in clinical care (mean, 72% of time) (group 2). Group 2 faculty had one third of the time for scholarly activities, reported slower career progress, and were less likely to be at the rank of professor (40% and 16% for groups 1 and 2, respectively; P<.001) or to be tenured (52% and 26%, respectively; P<.001) despite similar age and years on faculty. Group 2 faculty were 50% more likely to report that tenure and promotion criteria were not reviewed at their annual progress report (P =.003) and that they did not understand the criteria (P<.001). Group 2 faculty valued excellence in patient care over scholarship and national visibility. Group 2 faculty reported greater dissatisfaction with academic medicine and less commitment to a career in academic medicine. CONCLUSIONS: Physician faculty who spend more than 50% of their time in clinical care have less time, mentoring, and resources needed for development of an academic career. These obstacles plus differences in their attitudes about career success and recognition contribute to significant differences in promotion. These factors are associated with greater dissatisfaction with academic medicine and lower commitment to academic careers." "pubmed_article8": "Obstacles to promotion? Values of women faculty about career success and recognition. Committee on the Status of Women and Minorities, Virginia Commonwealth University, Medical College of Virginia Campus." "pubmed_abstract8": "PURPOSE: To assess attitudes of female faculty about career progress, resources for career development, and values related to academic success and recognition. METHOD: In 1997, the authors surveyed all faculty at Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and its associated Veterans Affairs Medical Center. RESULTS: Of 918 faculty, 567 (62%) responded to the survey; 33% of the respondents were women. Compared with men, women faculty were less likely to be tenured or at the level of professor, spent more time in clinical activities, had less time for scholarly activity, and reported slower career progress. Women were more likely to report that promotion and tenure criteria had not been reviewed with them. Significant differences were found between female physicians and non-physician faculty; female physicians reported the least time for scholarly activities and poorest understanding of promotion and tenure criteria. When the authors asked faculty how they valued certain indicators of career success, women were less likely to value leadership than were men. Female physicians were less likely to value scholarship and national recognition as indicators of their career success. CONCLUSION: This survey found important differences in career progress of male and female faculty, with women reporting less time for career development. In addition, there were differences in values related to career success and recognition, which were most pronounced for female physicians. These differences may have an important impact on promotion for women in general and particularly for female physicians." "pubmed_article9": "Prevention of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis: results of a patient survey." "pubmed_abstract9": "OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the current use of bone densitometry and agents to prevent bone loss among long-term corticosteroid users. METHODS: A telephone survey of patients receiving long-term oral corticosteroid treatment. RESULTS: One hundred forty-seven patients receiving a mean prednisone dose of 10 mg per day for an average of 1-2 years were surveyed. Twenty-nine percent reported having a bone density test, 29% were taking calcium supplements, and 45% were receiving vitamin D. Forty percent of postmenopausal (PMP) women were receiving hormone replacement therapy and 14%, bisphosphonate treatment. Forty-two percent of PMP women were receiving no preventive treatment. Patients who were evaluated by primary care physicians and rheumatologists were more likely to have undergone bone density testing and to have received preventive treatments than were patients of other specialists. CONCLUSION: Many patients receive inadequate treatment to prevent corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis, and physician specialty is an important predictor of bone density testing and treatment. A broad educational effort directed to physicians of varied specialties is needed to ensure that osteoporosis prevention becomes the standard of care for patients receiving long-term corticosteroid treatment." "pubmed_article10": "A cross sectional assessment of health status instruments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis participating in a clinical trial. Minocycline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial Group." "pubmed_abstract10": "OBJECTIVE: To (1) validate the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) as a generic functional health status measure in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA); and (2) assess correlations between the SF-36 and other outcome measures used in the Minocycline in Rheumatoid Arthritis (MIRA) Trial. METHODS: We conducted a cross sectional analysis of the final visit outcome measures from the 48 week, multicenter, placebo controlled, double blind MIRA trial. Multitrait scaling analyses assessed convergent and discriminant validity and internal consistency reliability of the SF-36 in the study patients. Responses to comparable items on the SF-36 and modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (M-HAQ) regarding physical functioning were compared and questions from both instruments were also compared to other RA outcome measures. RESULTS: In patients with RA, the SF-36 had high internal consistency and reliability, high discriminant and high convergent validity. Moderate correlations were observed (r = -0.46 to -0.61, p < 0.01 in each case) for comparable items on the SF-36 and M-HAQ regarding dressing, walking, and bending. Joint tenderness score correlations with items on the M-HAQ and SF-36, and joint tenderness score correlations with the SF-36 scales were higher than for joint swelling scores. Physician and patient global assessments were most highly correlated (r = 0.58 and 0.66; p < 0.01, respectively) with the SF-36 bodily pain item. CONCLUSION: The SF-36 is a valid instrument for this RA population. The SF-36 correlates with the M-HAQ and the physician and patient global assessments. The usefulness of the SF-36 in measuring change in RA clinical trials requires testing in longitudinal studies."
</wisdomcard>
Each WisdomCard is handcrafted by our team of physician-guided health advocates. Our goal is to make it easy for you to find the most useful health resources for any health topic. In addition to filtering out spam and bad links, WisdomCards highlight tips and warnings, such as:
Help improve this WisdomCard by suggesting great links.
Advertisement
This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here.
© 2012 OrganizedWisdom.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
OrganizedWisdom does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. If you think you
may have a medical emergency, call your doctor or 911 immediately.
As Seen In
